Our Aims and Objectives

We are the UK association for all those who research, study and teach global development issues

Find Out More

What is Development Studies

What is development studies and decolonising development.

Find Out More

Our Members

We have around 1,000 members, made up of individuals and around 40 institutions

Find Out More

Governance

Find out about our constitution, how we are run and meet our Council

Find Out More

People

Meet our Council members and other staff who support the running of DSA

Find Out More

About

The DSA Conference is an annual event which brings together the development studies community

Find Out More

DSA2024

Our conference this year is themed "Social justice and development in a polarising world"

Find Out More

Past Conferences

Find out about our previous conferences

Find Out More

Study Groups

Our Study Groups offer a chance to connect with others who share your areas of interest

Find Out More

Students and ECRs

Students and early career researchers are an important part of our community

Find Out More

Publications

Our book series with OUP and our relationship with other publishers

Find Out More

North-South Research

A series of workshops exploring North-South interdisciplinary research with key messages and reports

Find Out More

Membership Directory

Find out who our members are, where they are based and the issues they work on

Find Out More

The case of the CFA franc and a case for South-centred scholarship

By Anna Wood.

A workshop marking the 50th anniversary of the European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes was held at King’s College London ahead of the Development Studies Association annual conference in June. The workshop sought to pause and reflect on a number of other development studies journals, institutes and scholarly associations also marking ‘half century anniversaries’. The workshop was a reflection on the current state of the field and broadly focused on development framings and on the questions of universality and decolonisation.

The first panel asked: Should development be transformational or more modest? Sam Hickey (University of Manchester), who chaired the session, gave a potted history, over modernization and dependency theory, towards big narratives of the neoliberal era and introduced the main themes that would be covered by the speakers. I dwell here on Eyob Balcha Gebremariam’s (University of Bristol) provocation on ‘decentring coloniality.’ In his presentation he drew on the case of the CFA franc as an example of the enduring structures of coloniality which persistently undermine attempts at transformation; in the discussion he argued that the idea of transformation was a ‘luxurious debate to have’ in such contexts, warning of the need for care when we think about it. Having just returned from Dakar, Senegal, where demands to leave the CFA franc featured loudly in the recent election and its run up, I found this intervention particularly pertinent.

The case of the CFA franc is gaining increasing visibility, in scholarship and politics alike. Created in 1945, at the time pegged to the French franc, now to the Euro, it continues to bind France to fourteen countries (fifteen including the Comoros franc) across central and west Africa. Where the banknotes have been redesigned – from depictions of Marianne, symbolic of the French Republic, to African savannahs and monuments – the manufacture of its coins and notes, decision making on its valuation and foreign exchange transactions all happen in France. It is the only currency arrangement like it in the world, and one that continues to extract wealth and pose a significant obstacle to development across these regions.

Workshops like this one marking anniversaries are productive in presenting a moment of reflection on the history of the field. The case of the CFA franc taken here calls for the ‘recovery’ of conceptual tools and approaches like dependency theory, often considered outdated and sidelined from analytical work. Such calls can be read alongside a push back against the recent reframing of Development Studies as ‘global development,’ a universalising framing that obscures historical inequalities between the North and South. Pritish Behuria (University of Manchester), one of the co-authors of this paper just cited and one of the workshop convenors, highlighted this debate in his contribution on the day. Whether modest or transformational, such approaches restate the importance of South-centred and politically driven scholarship that is vital to guiding Development Studies as a field today.

Anna Wood is a Research Associate in the Department of Social Anthropology at the University of Cambridge studying poverty, social policy, and politics in Senegal.

Note:  This article gives the views of the author/academic featured and does not represent the views of the Development Studies Association as a whole.